News
Four Votes, Five Conditions, and Eighteen Lots Still on the Map: Hagen Plan Moves to the Council
After six weeks, sixty-six written comments, two file drawers, one full public hearing and a special meeting that used almost every chair again, the planning board recommended conditional approval of the Hagen-pasture subdivision. It is not a final approval, and everybody in the room knew the difference.

MISQUAH — The planning board voted 4–1 Tuesday night to recommend conditional approval of North Pine Land & Homes’ proposed eighteen-lot subdivision on the former Hagen pasture, sending the matter to the City Council after a summer in which the file acquired a second drawer, sixty-six written comments, nineteen pages of hearing minutes and a reputation larger than the forty-one acres themselves.
At 9:18 p.m., after two hours and eleven minutes of discussion, Commissioner Hovde moved to recommend conditional approval of the eighteen-lot preliminary plat subject to five conditions. Commissioner Ellefson seconded. Chairman Ross Vig restated the motion, asked Clerk Donna Skoglund to read the conditions back once, and then called the roll.
The recommendation keeps all eighteen lots in the preliminary plat but attaches five conditions before a final plat could be considered: a single common shoreline-access plan in place of eighteen individual dock locations; county-engineer approval of a widened entrance shoulder and turning area; site-specific septic and well review before any building permit; a seventy-five-foot vegetated shoreline buffer except for approved access corridors; and a final stormwater plan acceptable to the city engineer.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION — AUG. 25, 9:18 P.M.
Motion: Hovde. Second: Ellefson.
To recommend conditional approval of North Pine Land & Homes’ eighteen-lot preliminary plat for the former Hagen pasture, subject to:
1. One common shoreline-access plan in place of individual dock locations for the eighteen lots.
2. County-engineer approval of a widened entrance shoulder and turning area before execution of the development agreement.
3. Site-specific septic and well review before issuance of any building permit.
4. A seventy-five-foot vegetated shoreline buffer, except for approved access corridors.
5. A final stormwater plan acceptable to the city engineer before final-plat approval.
Roll call: Hovde — aye; Ellefson — aye; Maki — aye; Niskanen — no; Vig — aye. Motion carried, 4–1.
Those five conditions are not decorative language. Under the recommendation, North Pine would have to submit revised drawings showing the common-access area and shoreline corridor before staff would place a final plat on a council agenda. Individual lots would still be sold separately, but shoreline use would be governed through the common plan. The county-road work would have to be approved before the city signs off on the development agreement, and septic and well approvals would happen lot by lot rather than by assumption on the preliminary map.
“The word tonight is recommendation,” Vig said after the vote. “Not approval, not construction, not somebody showing up with a backhoe Thursday. We are telling the council what we think can work and under what conditions.”
Commissioner Niskanen cast the lone no vote. Niskanen said the shoreline and road conditions improved the proposal but did not answer the basic question of density.
“I can support development here,” Niskanen said. “I cannot support eighteen lots here. Those are not the same sentence.”
North Pine project manager Kevin Stang said after the meeting the company could work with the recommendation, though the common-dock requirement would force a redesign of the shoreline side of the plat. The company’s preliminary price range has been roughly $270,000 to $350,000 per home, depending on lot and building plan. Stang would not say whether the added road and shoreline work would change that range.
“We asked for eighteen lots and the board left eighteen lots,” Stang said. “They also gave us a list. A list is something you can price, engineer and answer. That is better than guessing.”
Amber Lindgren, the Third Avenue renter who spoke in favor of added housing at the July hearing, said the recommendation looked like the first document of the summer that treated the town’s housing shortage and its shoreline concerns as problems that had to exist at the same time.
“I still want the houses,” Lindgren said. “I also live here. I don’t want a bad road or eighteen docks in a little bay. I don’t think wanting a place for young families means I have to pretend the rest of it doesn’t matter.”
Opponents were less persuaded. Several stayed in the hall after the vote comparing the new conditions with the original drawings. One of the recurring objections remains whether a common dock simply concentrates the same shoreline pressure in one place. Another is whether the county-road shoulder can be made safe without moving the entrance farther from the existing curve.
Mayor Gloria Vik, who attended from the back row, said the council will not schedule final action until city staff and counsel turn the planning board’s conditions into language that can actually be administered.
“If we cannot tell a future zoning administrator what a condition means, then it is not a condition,” Vik said. “It is a wish.”
Ald. Pete Hagen, whose late uncle owned the pasture and who has remained recused from city deliberations, sat in the back row and did not speak during or after the meeting. He left through the side door while the board was gathering papers.
The question has moved slowly by local standards but not by subdivision standards. The first preliminary discussion was in June. The July 14 public hearing drew exactly forty speakers and filled the room with borrowed fire-hall chairs. The written-comment window closed Aug. 18 at sixty-six. Staff then sorted the record into four recurring subjects — road access, wells and septic systems, shoreline use and taxes — before the board’s special meeting last week.
Tuesday’s forty-four chairs were enough. Thirty-nine were occupied at the start. Twenty-seven people were still there when the vote was taken. Four remained in the parking lot at 9:46 discussing the county-road shoulder.
The City Council’s next regular meeting is Sept. 8. Vik said the Hagen matter may be received formally then but will not be voted on unless the revised staff language is ready and the item appears on the posted agenda.
The second file drawer is back in the clerk’s office.
It is still full.

